Tag Archives: John Hueston

John Hueston Gives Speech on Board Leadership

John Hueston continues his strange venture into speaking wide and far about ethics. The hypocritical nature of this is so mind-boggling that it actually compares to Sharron Watkins’s venture teaching companies how to be ethical after she admitted to insider trading.

For those who enjoy irony:

Wednesday, April 13, 2011 Meeting

Speaker: John Hueston
Partner, Irell & Manella LLP

Program Title: Why a Strong Code of Ethics Pays Off for Business

Program Description: John Hueston, currently the Litigation Trustee for billion dollar litigation involving Kerr McGee and a former lead Enron prosecutor, explains how Board of Directors and Company Officers can save money and preserve goodwill by taking four specific steps in establishing and demonstrating ethical codes and in promoting accountability at the Board level.

About the Speaker: John is a litigation partner at Irell & Manella, LLP, and has been selected to serve as lead trial counsel by governments and Fortune 500 companies in a variety of cases. A former lead prosecutor for the Enron trial of Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling, Mr. Hueston also devotes a substantial part of his practice to internal investigations, corporate crisis management and white collar criminal defense. Before serving on the Enron Task Force, Mr. Hueston served as Chief of the Southern Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California. John has lectured on the topics of trial advocacy and corporate governance at law and business schools nationally. He is a graduate of Yale Law School and Dartmouth College, and is President of the Orange County Bar Association.

Date and Time:
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
12:00 p.m. – 1:15 p.m.

Registration opens at 11:30 a.m.

Location:
Scott’s Restaurant & Bar
3300 Bristol St.
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(714) 979-2400

Costs: $35

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enron Task Force

Mass and Breakfast With John Hueston

ViaCatholic Business Journal:

Mass & Breakfast with John Hueston
When: 6:30 am Mass; 7:00 Breakfast May 12, 2011
Where: Hilton Hotel 3050 Bristol St., Costa Mesa, CA
Organization: Catholics at Work OC – Orange County, CA
Contact Information:
Contact Name: Mark McElrath Ph: 714.401.0845
Website: http://www.catholicsatworkOC.com
Details:
John Hueston, the award-winning and headline garnering low-key, persistent attorney who was the lead prosecutor in the ENRON trial and task force will deliver an intimate look at ethics in the workplace. Excellent program!! Not to be missed!

Ethics in the workplace? Are you kidding me? This is grotesque.

1 Comment

Filed under Enron Task Force

John Hueston: It Began At A Local High School

The coverage of the incoming Ocean County President of the Bar Association slobbers over him like Kathy Ruemmler slobbers over the cocks of married men in elevators. Read it. Enjoy it even. And note the money quote:

“He doesn’t just win, he destroys.” To this day, that still seems to be the best way to sum up what John does in trial.

Is that really the objective of the justice system? To destroy? I wonder if he’s proud of himself.

2 Comments

Filed under Enron Task Force

Googlelicious: Searching The Enron Task Force

I am pleased that I’m on the front page of several of the ETF’s google results. It warms my cold, cold heart. Or it would if I had a heart.

I have to say I’m more than a little amused that google picked up my break up letter instead of any of the other Berkowitz posts. But that’s just as well, I think. I rather like having that as the fourth link.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enron Task Force

John Hueston Loses First Trial Ever In His Career

Via LA Observed:

John C. Hueston, the former federal prosecutor who secured the convictions of Enron executives Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling, lost a case in an Orange County courtroom last week. That’s only news because he had never before suffered a trial defeat, the Los Angeles Daily Journal reports tomorrow. “I guess now I’m a real trial lawyer,” the Irell & Manella partner told reporter Don J. DeBenedictis.

If only that landmark was made during the Enron trial.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enron Task Force

Gratuitous: Ruemmler & Hueston Chat

Kathy Ruemmler: Oh no… I think I smell my vagina.
Sean Berkowitz: Do you smell something?
Kathy Ruemmler: I think it’s my vagina.
John Hueston: Oh, I thought it was mine.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enron Task Force

John Hueston Appointed To White House Task Force To Fight Financial Crime

From the Enron Task Force to the White House task force on Financial Crime, John Hueston is making his name in the art of task-forcery. Timothy Gaithner today announced that the consensus that Wall Street was over-regulated has been finally denounced. He said that we need “stronger and smarter rules”, of which John Hueston will ostensibly be called to enforce.

This is the man who said in a legal paper that he used Smartest Guys In The Room as a “roadmap” to prosecute Jeff Skilling and Dr. Lay.

This is just not going to end well.

4 Comments

Filed under Enron Task Force

Did Hueston Just Admit To Something?

I honestly do not know the answer to that question. Dealbook quotes John Hueston in an article about the Bear Stearns case:

“A case based on internal e-mails, bereft of context, can teeter precariously when witnesses appear at trial and provide an unanticipated framework,” said John Hueston, who prosecuted Enron’s former top executives, Jeffrey Skilling and Kenneth L. Lay. “That’s the lesson we learned in Enron. Be careful with what appears, on its face, to be a smoking gun.”

Is he admitting that prosecutors believed one thing, based on company emails, and were surprised when witnesses contradicted that belief? That is what it sounds like to me.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enron

John Hueston Defends Countrywide Boss

Enron Task Force waterboy John Hueston famously questioned Dr. Ken Lay at trial, seething with apparent resentment for all things corporate. But now that he’s in the private sector, he’s joined his fellow ETF alum Sean Berkowitz by now defending high profile corporate defendants. While Berkowitz defends Joe Naccio, Hueston is now defending former Countrywide Financial boss Angelo Mozilo. Hueston is Mozilo’s co-lead attorney against SEC civil fraud and insider trading charges, as well as in a related criminal investigation.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enron

Hueston To Remain On The San Bernardino Case

The political situation in San Bernardino is spiraling out of control. And who better to suss out the truth than John Hueston, currently handling the lawsuit against former tax assessor Bill Postmus and five others. After a three-month investigation, Mr. Hueston uncovered such crimes as certain employees only working seven hours a day instead of eight.

But Mr. Hueston is not finished with San Bernardino County yet. The Board of Supervisors will vote Tuesday on whether to double — to $500,000 — the contract with the Orange County law firm of Irell & Manella.

The problem with hiring John Hueston is that you’re hiring John Hueston. He’s a weasel: sneaky, underhanded, dishonest, and not blessed with any intellectual depth.

The District Attorney this week brought charges against another of Postmus’s staff, citing the report that John Hueston issued as proof of Rex Gutierrez’s wrongdoing. Naturally, Hueston is taking credit for the arrest – which is angering the District Attorney. Hueston’s unquenchable desire for power would be funny if not for the frightening consequences.

Before this is over, I expect at least half a dozen new arrests, and Hueston will be there, cheerleading all the human misery he can drum up.

3 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Why Didn’t John Hueston Find The Emails He Expected?

The expanding corruption probe into former San Bernardino County tax assessor Bill Postmus and his staff has so far resulted in a 33-page report and a civil lawsuit for a raft of crimes. The probe, led by Enron Task Force alumnus John C. Hueston, unearthed such horrific crimes as a politician who performed politics while in office, and the allegation (though no actual proof, as Hueston states) that workers may not have put in an honest forty hours per week. As far as government corruption, this is not sexy stuff.

The most exciting allegation seems to be that the lackof emails outlining the various conspiracies in the tax assessor’s office proves that there was a conspiracy.

Hueston was the Wachovia of the Enron Task Force and in this case, he’s still the big basket of troubled assets. He used the exact same argument with Enron: because Jeff Skilling did not keep notes of his massive conspiracy, he must be guilty.

Bill Postmus and his staff did use emails, but they used BlackBerry PIN messages more. The reason was not, as Hueston claims, because the staff kept all their evil conspiratorial messages off the State server (and thus out of Hueston’s jurisdiction) that way. They used PIN messages because the tax assessor’s emails were constantly being hacked by political opponents. When they got wise to this, the staff moved to PIN messages for their sensitive messages.

Naturally, Hueston had to justify his inquisition and this is the kind of trivia he submits as proof that the County was right to investigate the tax assessor.

The lack of evidence is not evidence. One can not defend against a negative. Mr. Postmus and his staff should not be put against the ropes for using a convenient PIN-based messaging service instead of county email servers to conduct their business. They’ve done nothing wrong. As the lack of evidence shows.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enron

John Hueston Threatens Former Tax Assessor Spokesman

Former Enron Task Force prosecutor John C. Hueston is up to his old tricks again. However, this time, instead of railroading energy tycoons Jeff Skilling and Ken Lay, he’s set his sights on ordinary citizens at the Tax Assessor’s Office in San Bernardino, California.

This saga begins with allegations that Bill Postmus was abusing drugs and committing other crimes while in office. The county was authorized to hire outside lawyers to investigate the allegations and determine if there was enough evidence to remove Postmus from office.

Enter John C. Hueston. Hueston immediately snapped on his Enron Task Force underoos and got to work. In February, Mr. Hueston contacted many of the county employees at the office, including the former spokesman for Bill Postmus, Ted Leher. Mr. Leher was one of the majority who told Hueston that there was no malfeasance in the Tax Assessor’s office.

On Wednesday, May 13, 2009, Mr. Hueston issued a 33-page report, concluding the tax assessor’s office was a hive of fraud. He alleged that the office had defrauded taxpayers of hundreds of thousands of dollars while operating a political machine on county time. According to the report, some staffers rarely showed up for work, were paid higher-than-average salaries, engaged in questionable hiring practices and worked on political campaigns for Republican candidates.

Postmus denied any wrongdoing and called the report a “taxpayer-funded hit piece.”

After reading the report, Mr. Leher spoke to the media and said that the report erroneously mischaracterized the events and personalities at the tax office. On that same Wednesday, Mr. Leher received a voicemail from John C. Hueston. The former prosecutor informed Leher it was “in your best interest” to call him back to “discuss your status” as it relates to the report. A dutiful citizen, Mr. Leher called Mr. Hueston back, and was told that his unsworn statements (i.e., statements collected for the report) were very different from what he told the media. And – “if this continues, you may be added to the lawsuit.” After threatening Mr. Leher, Hueston then ordered him to issue a press release retracting his statements to the media.

Mr. Leher refused. Mr. Leher instead did the more difficult thing and issued a press release stating that Mr. Hueston has threatened him with being added to the lawsuit unless he stops speaking out about the findings in the 33-page report. Mr. Hueston denies threatening Mr. Leher in any way and states that Mr. Leher’s statements that went into the report were true. “It was impressive in how confessional it was,” Hueston said.

“It was very intimidating to receive a phone call from a former federal prosecutor who told me that I needed to retract a public statement, otherwise he felt it was contradictory to what I told him,” Lehrer said.

Hueston was sending him a message that he could face a lawsuit, Lehrer said.

Hueston said he followed up with Lehrer only to find out if he was telling the truth now or during their interview.

Unfortunately for Mr. Hueston, this is the same pattern he used with the unindicted co-conspirators at Enron. He would call them (not their attorneys, as is proper) and tell them they were going to be indicted unless they stopped talking to the defense. This is documented. This is a fact.

Mr. Hueston seems intent on amassing as many big scandal-busting points as he possibly can, even if the scandals are completely fabricated by himself.

I will be following this case very closely with regular updates. Wouldn’t it be great to see this megalomaniac former prosecutor brought to justice by the ordinary citizens of a tax assessor’s office? I am cheering for the good guys.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

John Hueston Talks Values

John Hueston, Enron Task Force prosecutor, will be the guest speaker at the Catholics at Work breakfast meeting Oct. 14 at Crow Canyon Country Club, 711 Silver Lake Dr. in Danville, CA.

Hueston will share his stories about how power and responsibility were warped by the abandonment of values.

Ostensibly he doesn’t mean his own warped values (ie, see this essay in which he discusses having to “work extra hard” to convict Skilling and Lay since there was no evidence against them.)

The cost is $20 for members or $25 for non members.

For more information or to register for the event, visit http://www.catholicsatwork.org.

2 Comments

Filed under Enron

John Hueston Chats About Credit Crisis

John Hueston was quoted in this LA Times story on the credit crunch:

Absent a major shift in priorities and resources, the Justice Department and the FBI figure to continue on their current path of focusing on simple cases “that don’t go to the heart of the problem,” said John C. Hueston, a Los Angeles lawyer who was a lead federal prosecutor in the trials of Enron executives Kenneth L. Lay and Jeffrey K. Skilling.

That just came out of nowhere, didn’t it? I have to ask: what’s his angle here? What’s going on? My antennae is twitching.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Enron

Rex Shelby Update

How on earth did I miss this?  It’s a press release, I think, from Rex Shelby’s attorney’s office, but there’s some new information in it that piqued my interest.

Two former Enron executives that are up for retrial are asking that the trial be blocked based on new information that has come out in a former prosecutor’s book. Rex Shelby, former engineering and operations chief for Enron Broadband, is represented by Ed Tomko of Curran Tomko Tarski in Dallas, Texas. They claim that passages from a recent book published by John Kroger, a former Enron Task Force prosecutor, “add to the evidence” that the Task Force went on a “broad fishing expedition” to get evidence and they are claiming that prosecutors “presented false evidence and incomplete and misleading testimony.”

This shows a continuation in the efforts of those indicted by the government to show that the U.S. Department of Justice’s Enron Task Force withheld evidence and testimony in order to receive convictions in the cases brought against the executives of Enron. Shelby is not alone in this quest. There have already been several trials, retrials and acquittals in the cases against the many Enron Broadband executives. Ed Tomko, the lawyer for Rex Shelby, asserts that in reading the excerpts and passages from Kroger’s book it appears he made up his mind to achieve convictions of these executives and ignored the complexity of the technology involved, withheld witness testimony that would support their case and “withheld evidence” that the executives could have used in their defense.

This demonstrates the continued complexities surrounding Enron. With the increased scrutiny placed on corporations and the intense focus on the sub-prime and mortgage lending crisis, there will be future developments.

I love seeing the prosecutor’s own words used against them. John Hueston’s essay about the Enron case should be used by every single defendant out there. He writes in the first paragraph that there was no proof that either Jeff Skilling or Dr. Lay did anything wrong so he’d have to work extra hard to secure a conviction.

I’m sure John Kroger – the Lesser Prosecutor – is equally as arrogant. I’ve not read his book but I’m glad that at least Shelby and his co-defs have. And I’m not shocked at all that they’ve found exonerating evidence in it.

2 Comments

Filed under Enron