The Radical Light of Glaciers

When I was in middle school, my social studies class room was dominated by a large map that hung over the white board, which the teacher would roll up during tests. The map was dominated by Siberia, a sprawling white mass on top of the globe. It filled one-twelfth of the land mass of the whole Earth, yet that was all I knew for certain of the place. A bleak beauty and indelible fear surrounded the entire subject. As we learned about the ice fields and snow, the emptiness became a source of obsession for me. Its white spaces seemed to recede into fantasies and apprehension: permafrost: great cities lost among ice floes, where mammoths sleep under glaciers: gulags, and the slow rebuilding of nuclear missile silos. The violences of geography and time seemed too cold and too vast to be precisely real.

As I am driving down a black-top road in another place that seems to me as foreign as, and much less beautiful than, Siberia, the memory of my middle school map puzzles me. Why does this place conjure the same vast loneliness of Siberia? What is it about isolation that makes me feel so at home?

The answer impends through the darkness of my imagination, and presents itself just as I see the first sign for the prison: It is the place from which you will not return. Where you freeze in time.

I am going to prison to interview a person who, I believe, has something important to tell me about Enron. My Enron book has turned me into a journalist; it is a lifestyle and a pursuit that suits me well. I am born to write, of course, but I never believed that Enron, dead now ten years, would become such an all-consuming passion – the subject that will define my ability.

I am nervous about meeting him because like everyone else I know who worked there, I am in awe of this person. I realize that is not very journalist-like, to love your subjects the way I do, but it’s the only way I know how to write. I must feel compelled; I must be motivated by my own strangling desire to know.

The prison is located in the middle of nowhere – the Siberia of America. The building looks like a rejected entry for the LBJ Library.

I have been warned that the correctional officers can be jerks; they can decide, arbitrarily, that I will not be allowed to visit today. I’ve been given a sheet that tells me what I can and can not wear (no open toe shoes, for instance, no short skirts.) I have dressed in a way that no-one could possibly find fault: black wide-leg pants, a white shirt, black cardigan, smart patent leather heels – but not too high. I’m the very picture of modesty. I am, in fact, plain as an Amish teacher.

Despite my fears of being manhandled, and the warnings that they are jerks, the correctional officers are polite to me and they do not seem to even care what I am wearing (success!). It takes about forty minutes before I am admitted into the visiting room.

The visiting room is small. My eyes scan the people at the tables, and snag when I recognize him. We have written letters for nearly a year and I feel like I know him intimately, but this is the first time I’ve actually seen him. The shock of it sort of dazes me. He is looking at me, wondering if I am me, and I smile. As I approach, he stands up. He is wearing khaki prison clothing, and when I hug him, I feel his body lean underneath the heavy fabric. For those two seconds, I noticed that he feels warm and good.

I am not allowed to bring anything into the room with me – no notebooks, no pens, no cell phones. Only a bit of cash for the vending machines. I buy us Cokes and M&Ms. To my surprise, though I was nervous, there is no awkwardness at all. Like our letters, we fall immediately into conversation about who we know in common, who said what, and the personal details of our daily lives.

His eyes are calm and intelligent, though they seem to dim at times and a weary cant comes to them, like clouds suddenly appearing on a sunny day. At one point I ask if he is lonely – a question that seemed ridiculous to myself as soon as I asked. He says he tries not to think about things in terms like that. “Loneliness is a negative,” he says, “I don’t spend a lot of time thinking about what I don’t have.”

“What do you think about, then?”

“I daydream a lot.”

It seems impolite to ask what he daydreams about, so I didn’t prompt him. Instead, I changed direction and asked him about some of the challenged Enron transactions, the things that would be on the record in my book, the data clusters that would complete the picture of Enron.

Yet the conversation did not stay on that trajectory. We kept talking about personal things. Though it was in no way romantic, I was reminded of that particular experience of being newly in love and telling my beloved the story of my life. It is a universal discussion; every couple in the world has had this conversation. It is edited and truncated, but it is the first introduction into the history of each other. As he spoke, I listened with the queer, new experience of already knowing this. I’d read books, I’d talked to others, I’d researched the public record. It was unnerving to have pre-determined opinions about him.

At some point, he was talking about something that had been painful to him, and I reached across the table and took his hand. That strange darkness came to his expressive eyes, like he was looking out at the burned chapels and razed fields of his past, and I wondered if I’d made a terrible mistake. As I began to move my hand, he covered it with his other hand. “It’s nice,” he said.

I knew he was lonely. I knew why he hadn’t answered me directly: silence gives dignity to the suffering, and intensifies it.

The warm, pleasant contact was not romantic. It was not sexy. That added a strange, intimate dimension to it, which humbled me.

The meeting lasted six hours. As visiting hours came to an end, we said goodbye but I was reluctant to leave. I felt the need to impart myself to him, to give him myself so he would be a little less lonely. As he hugged me goodbye, I pressed a chaste kiss to his cheek.

That evening, in the hotel, I could not sleep. I kept thinking of my friend. I got out of bed and drove my rental car around the small town. I found a park, and sat on a bench under the thumbprint moon, thinking about the private pain in each of us, the Siberian loneliness that attacks at odd hours. But I remembered those fortunate moments, too, inexplicable in their wonder, in which a cold sun shines, substantial and explicit, bright as glass, inexhaustible, and true, melting the glaciers, creating a small path for one soul to tentatively, gently, touch another.

About these ads

13 Comments

Filed under Enron

13 Responses to The Radical Light of Glaciers

  1. Rude1

    You know, you’re writing never ceases to amaze me.

  2. Relatively few business books do a good job of portraying the emotional aspects that are always a part of real business…based on Cara’s writing on this blog, I’m confident she will do this very well.

  3. Sean

    Beautiful essay, Cara. I love the way you write.

  4. Cara Ellison

    Thank you very much, Sean, David and Rude1. It’s nice to be appreciated. : )

  5. Stan

    Cara, did this really happened or it’s only your imagination?

  6. Cara Ellison

    Yes, it happened. I mark fiction with a fiction tag or sometimes “foolishness.”

  7. Andie

    I know ( believe) you hate me and my commits but, take this to heart. I have always heard that it was posable to be in love with someone in a non-romance way Philos love – a love based on friendship between two people. but I have never realties how hard that it must be those whom are in those in emotional intimate relationships because one or both people maybe in “love” relationships and I think many do not, on the face, see this love as that can hold, guide and compet you.  After reading this my eyes began to water. And was reminded of the vesre ” for what greater love is there than a (person) who laid down his life for his friend” ms. Ellison is doing a combination of these words and “to give yourself a living sacrifice” on those you love. That is post said to me; the beautiful pain and renewing power of Philos love and how peruse can be found out of that. Sorry if I misread or upset you with this commit, I now understand your committment to your love ones and get it on
    A new level. 

  8. Cara Ellison

    Andie, I do not hate you or your comments!

  9. BV

    Wait. Is this real? Is this an in-joke? I’m honestly asking. I really had the impression that you were an ex-Enron employee. Maybe a mid level manager that went to company meetings and idolized the execs. I know a lot of people like that. It’s fine. I don’t usually get star struck by business moguls, but I get it. And these guys are smart. Lying unethical conmen, but super, super smart.

    But you’ve never actually seen this guy before? I guess you mean in person because I assume you’ve seen pictures. I guess I’m just surprised by the passion of your defense (from reading some of your other posts but mainly from the one rebutting the documentary) of what conventional wisdom, congressional testimony, many guilty pleas and convictions of the top executives in the company say was massive fraud for a guy or guys that you’ve never even seen. I hope when you publish your book you’ll do it under your real name because I’m very interested in your motivation.

    I just had a thought. Is the guy in prison not an ex-Enron employee? I have no idea now. I guess I should stop thinking about this now.

  10. Cara Ellison

    Hi BV,

    Yes, it is real. I am puzzled by your comment.

    Why would it be odd to never meet in person someone I exchanged letters with in prison? He was a former Enron executive – of course he was, why else would I post this on the Enron blog?

    I guess you mean in person because I assume you’ve seen pictures.
    I guess I’m just surprised by the passion of your defense (from reading some of your other posts but mainly from the one rebutting the documentary) of what conventional wisdom, congressional testimony, many guilty pleas and convictions of the top executives in the company say was massive fraud for a guy or guys that you’ve never even seen.

    I had never seen him in person before that. Why is this odd? Of course I’ve seen him on news reports, etc. I feel like I’m missing something here — that there is a mystery about this?

    Secondly: “conventional wisdom” is often wrong. Usually wrong, even. Remember when Conventional Wisdom said that John Kerry was going to win in 2004? Wrong. There are a thousand of these examples.

    Congressional testimony. What part of the congressional testimony did you find so compelling?

    Many guilty pleas. Ah yes, I’ve spoken quite extensively about guilty pleas. They didn’t plead guilty because they are guilty. They pled guilty in order to avoid longer prison sentences.

    Many convictions. I’m curious what you mean by this. Do you mean jury convictions? There were four. One of the defendants died before sentencing, then another one was overturned. That leaves two – Dan Boyle and Jeff Skilling. (Dan Boyle probably could have won on appeal but chose not to.) Not really “many”.

    I hope when you publish your book you’ll do it under your real name because I’m very interested in your motivation.

    My motivation is simple and transparent: these guys are not guilty, and I am outraged that the government has wielded its power so abusively against them.

  11. BV

    I thought I was pretty clear. I was surprised that you have this level of passion/outrage for people that you’ve never met. Given the overwhelming evidence of fraud and unethical behavior, it just seems an odd hill to die on for a guy that you’ve never seen. And as I said, I thought you’re a former Enron employee that had a perceived personal relationship with these individuals. I just find it odd that you’ve never laid eyes on one of the 18 people that are doing time for this.
    I think it is extremely unlikely (not impossible, just very, very unlikely) that 16 people pled to federal time for a crime they didn’t commit. Take it to a jury if you’re innocent or if you think the government can’t make their case. If the government is as corrupt (and for some reason fixated on bringing down Enron’s management) as you say, rely on a jury of your peers. You seem like a principled person. Would you cop a plea? If these guys are as noble, wealthy and intelligent as you believe wouldn’t they fight the tyranny that you’re saying is at work here? I mean on one hand they’re titans of industry, great men, and they deserve all of the money that they can make. On the other they’re doe eyed innocents being led to the slaughter by the nefarious forces of big government. You can’t have it both ways.
    The congressional testimony that I found compelling (and some of this was 10 years ago but I’ve been on C-Span since) was Skillings’. McMahon’s and Watkin’s. Also the two guys from the board that appeared with Skilling whose names escape me. The only time I thought Skilling was telling the truth was when he was apologizing to Mrs. Baxter for relaying a conversation that he had with Cliff Baxter. My favorite bit, my very favorite, was Skilling trying to explain why he didn’t sign the forms. Just quality lying.
    Let me ask you a couple of questions. How do you feel about Atlas Shrugged? Garbage or blueprint for the best society ever? Why do you hold individual investors in such contempt? Assume that what most people believe is true, that Enron was lying on their financial statements. Do you still think that it’s just tough that people lost their investments? What if I sold you a car that I swore was new and I showed you the documentation to prove it but then you found out that it had 100K miles on it? Go screw or do you have recourse?

    Finally, you’re right. Conventional Wisdom can often be wrong but it can be right too. I should have used a better phrase, like “the facts” or “sworn testimony” or “people that believe we landed on the moon”.

  12. Cara Ellison

    I thought I was pretty clear.

    That’s the gotcha of communication, isn’t it?


    I was surprised that you have this level of passion/outrage for people that you’ve never met.

    You’re making all kinds of wild, crazy, incorrect assumptions. I did not not know the person I visited in prison. Why would I know all 36 people who were prosecuted? Some were at Merrill Lynch, some were at EBS, some were at Enron. Those were wildly divergent units. I didn’t know THIS ONE PERSON.


    Given the overwhelming evidence of fraud and unethical behavior, it just seems an odd hill to die on for a guy that you’ve never seen.

    You’ll have to illustrate what you mean by fraud and unethical behavior. Furthermore, how am I dying on a hill for any of them?


    And as I said, I thought you’re a former Enron employee that had a perceived personal relationship with these individuals.

    You’re attempting to belittle and condescend to me. I don’t appreciate that. My connection to Enron is private; my connection is irrelevant.


    I just find it odd that you’ve never laid eyes on one of the 18 people that are doing time for this.

    This is a strange sentence. I know plenty of them. I didn’t know this one. Why is this so odd to you?


    I think it is extremely unlikely (not impossible, just very, very unlikely) that 16 people pled to federal time for a crime they didn’t commit.

    Well, you’ve never been part of a witch hunt.


    Take it to a jury if you’re innocent or if you think the government can’t make their case.

    Great, just like most of them planned before they realized that the environment in Houston at the time virtually guaranteed convictions, regardless of proof. Or, like Rex Shelby, if you run out of money before you can go to trial, you’re pretty much screwed.

    When I see statements like this, I just think the author has had wonderful luck never having been pursued by the government before. I used to believe the same thing. Then I learned different.

    If the government is as corrupt (and for some reason fixated on bringing down Enron’s management) as you say, rely on a jury of your peers.

    The same peers who the Houston Chronicle found favored convictions before the trials had even begun.

    And don’t take my word for it that the government was intent on taking down Enron. Read John Kroger’s book. He’s pretty open about his lust for power, even stating that bringing the Enron execs down would restore his insulted sense of manhood after his girlfriend cheated on him.


    You seem like a principled person. Would you cop a plea?

    What makes you think I haven’t?


    If these guys are as noble, wealthy and intelligent as you believe wouldn’t they fight the tyranny that you’re saying is at work here?

    They did. And some, like James Brown and Jeff Skilling, still are. Ken Rice and Kevin Hannon fought for a long time before accepting pleas. Rex Shelby fought for eight years. All of them except two started off ready to fight.


    I mean on one hand they’re titans of industry, great men, and they deserve all of the money that they can make. On the other they’re doe eyed innocents being led to the slaughter by the nefarious forces of big government. You can’t have it both ways.

    Of course I can. There is nobody richer than the US Government. The unlimited resources quickly dispatched Jeff Skilling’s funds. Rex Shelby saved money by writing many briefs himself and working 60 hours a week on his own defense. The fact that they were rich becomes moot when compared to the government’s resources.


    The congressional testimony that I found compelling (and some of this was 10 years ago but I’ve been on C-Span since) was Skillings’. McMahon’s and Watkin’s.

    Watkins. I’m curious – do you know she’s an insider trader? Did you know that she admitted it during that very congressional session, and later at the trial of Jeff Skilling?


    Also the two guys from the board that appeared with Skilling whose names escape me. The only time I thought Skilling was telling the truth was when he was apologizing to Mrs. Baxter for relaying a conversation that he had with Cliff Baxter.My favorite bit, my very favorite, was Skilling trying to explain why he didn’t sign the forms. Just quality lying.

    Well, the congressional testimony was years before the trials. I just wonder if even back then you would give them the presumption of innocence.


    Let me ask you a couple of questions. How do you feel about Atlas Shrugged? Garbage or blueprint for the best society ever?

    Neither.

    Why do you hold individual investors in such contempt?

    Because they were stupid and after Enron went under, they were weak and entitled. They did something really stupid, and when it bit them in the ass, they whined for their mamas. The only ones who didn’t whine were the execs who lost more than any other investors.


    Assume that what most people believe is true, that Enron was lying on their financial statements. Do you still think that it’s just tough that people lost their investments?

    Yes. Because under no circumstances would it be okay to put all of your retirement into one stock. If the execs did that, they should go to prison, and they should be punished. Doesn’t change the fact that the investors were idiots.


    What if I sold you a car that I swore was new and I showed you the documentation to prove it but then you found out that it had 100K miles on it? Go screw or do you have recourse?

    Apples and eggs. The point is that the investors put all their money in Enron stock. Nobody held a gun to their heads. As a man, you are responsible for where you put your sperm. As an investor, you are responsible for where you put your money. Same thing.


    Finally, you’re right. Conventional Wisdom can often be wrong but it can be right too. I should have used a better phrase, like “the facts” or “sworn testimony” or “people that believe we landed on the moon”.

    Facts? Like what? You’ve provided neither facts nor any sworn testimony. I’ll ignore your dig at the end there. For now.

  13. Andie

    You said “My experience with Enron simply did not comport with that characterization”
    Look I’m a fan of yours. You take saying that your connection with Enron is irreverent. Not so if I starting a blog about enron innocent it would not mean anything because I was -2years old when the company was formed and a ninth grader when enron fell.
    You have every right to your privacy, yet you are some one who work at enron, and you’re tell the truth. Forgive me, but that why this blog is powerful. You know the truth and starting a blog to spend that truth. I’m just saying you know the truth and whatever part of that truth you share we be grateful for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s