November 9, 2009

Allegedly Yours

Take a peek at the ABC.com website and count the number of times the word “alleged” or “allegedly” is used in describing the massacre at Ft. Hood.

Based on my writing about Enron, I think any honest person must agree that I believe strongly in defendant’s rights, even a piece of crap like Major Hasan. But I don’t understand why he’s “alleged” to have killed those people. Many people saw him do it. There’s really no doubt that it was him.

And yet, the media says “alleged” murderer.

They were not so kind to the Enron defendants, many of whom were described as “scheming”, “devious”, etc. etc. There was no need for such technicalities for the men and two women in the Enron saga.

November 3, 2009

Kevin Howard – Misfiled

Did anyone else notice that the Chron’s coverage of Kevin Howard is under the heading “Enron Barge Trial”?

KevinHoward_Barge

If they’re this careless with something so basic, one must ask what else they’re getting wrong.

November 3, 2009

Enron and Seinfeld: Shrinkage

I’ve compared Enron and Seinfeld before (here and here) and in keeping with that theme, I present: Shrinkage.

According to Wikipedia, this is “The Hamptons” episode of Seinfeld:

The four principal characters travel to the Hamptons to see a baby; they find that the baby is altogether ugly. While on the beach, Kramer finds a filled lobster trap and thinks the catch is his, unaware that it’s a commercial lobster trap. George’s girlfriend goes sun tanning topless while he goes out to get tomatoes; and George is seen naked by Jerry’s girlfriend Rachel, to whom he tries vainly to explain that, having just gotten out of the cold water, he is a victim of penile “shrinkage.”

The ETF has a terrible case of shrinkage. They believed they were well positioned to show the world just how big and strong they were, and they failed. Thus, the shrinkage.

With Scott Yeager, they had a particularly bad case of shrinkage. They rushed to indict the Broadband executives, then when they walked away empty handed after the first trial, they tried to explain “it was cold in the pool” but they could give a better showing if they were given another chance.

Scott Yeager challenged them. He basically said, “Bring it, bitches,” and took them back and forth to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court, back to the Fifth, and the ETF never could quite warm up enough to overcome the shrinkage. If they had a case, they couldn’t show it.

They postured a great deal, but when Scott walked in on them, they were tiny.

And now they’re about to do the same thing with Rex Shelby. It promises to be a great show – funny and ridiculous, and completely devoid of substance as the “show about nothing.”

November 2, 2009

Statement on Un-Approved Comments

I’ve deleted several comments when they got snagged in moderation. Perhaps this is a good time to explain what is and is not acceptable when discussing Enron.

You may not come to my blog and dump invective. To do so will get you deleted with prejudice.

You don’t have to believe that Enron was a good company, or that the executives are innocent. But you absolutely must be polite.

Do not leave a “drive-by” post and expect me to allow it to stay up. An example, “Everybody at Enron was a crook and you are crazy to believe otherwise.” That’s just high-calorie garbage and it gets zapped.

If you believe the Enron executives are guilty, or if you want to talk about a specific transaction or unit, feel free. Just be polite, and make sure you back up your positions with facts, quotes, etc.

Those are the rules. I’m not intolerant of those who think the Enron folks are guilty, but I’m intolerant of stupidity.

Also: there was no fraud or conspiracy at Enron.

November 2, 2009

Kevin Howard Sentenced

Kevin Howard was sentenced today to one year of probation — nine months of that under home confinement — in a plea deal in which prosecutors stipulated he did not personally benefit from his crime.

Via Chron:

Rather than go to trial for the third time, Kevin Howard agreed to a deal that required no prison time. He pleaded guilty to one count of falsifying books and records. Howard stood in court Monday with a group of family and friends in the audience, including his former codefendant Michael Krautz, who wrote a glowing letter to the court about Howard.

U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore sentenced Howard to also pay a $25,000 fine and said for the first nine months of his probation he can only go to work, church, medical appointments and educational classes. Gilmore said that while Howard’s actions did not cause the ultimate downfall of Enron, which collapsed in 2001, and while he got no personal benefit from his action, he still must be held accountable.

Whoa. Wait. Why must he be held accountable if he did not benefit from his actions, and his actions did not play into the collapse of Enron? Oh, right, I remember, this is an Enron case, therefore everyone must pay regardless of innocence.

“You will be restricted. It’s jail, but jail at home,” she said. She said he can’t coach sports or go to dinners or parties or shows and if he violates the order he will go to prison.

Kevin Howard is innocent. I’m disappointed he got nine months instead of four (or none!) But as far as Enron sentences go, it’s not terrible. I hope that he has found some peace.

We here at Cara Ellison Corp keep a good thought for him.

November 2, 2009

Kevin Howard Sentencing Today

Kevin Howard is scheduled to be sentenced today. I’ll update as soon as possible. Meanwhile, my fingers are crossed that the judge gives him the absolute minimum (four months home confinement.)

October 30, 2009

Jeff Skilling “Cracking”?

NYT reports that the Bear Stearns trial progresses apace. Dan Slater, however, compares the flat demeanors of the Bear witnesses to Jeff Skilling: “Nothing, for instance, like Enron’s former chief executive, Jeffrey K. Skilling, cracking during cross-examination and karate-chopping the air during his 2006 trial.”

What?

Jeff Skilling did not crack. Jeff Skilling does not crack. I find this a weird statement because even a cursory glance back at the 2006 trial will reveal a calm, composed Skilling. He did not crack. I don’t know where he got that idea.

As for his “karate chopping”, I think he’s referring to a Skilling gesture that does not look like a karate chop at all. I can visualize it better than describing it but here goes: both hands in front, fingers straight, facing each other , and then slanting outward in a brief, cutting motion.

Anyway, I find his mention of Skilling gratuitous and mean – and inaccurate.

October 27, 2009

Sean Berkowitz Campaigning For Senate Hopeful

Sean Berkowitz and other former US attorneys are shilling for David H. Hoffman for US Senate. Hoffman, who was most recently the inspector general for the City of Chicago, is seeking the Democratic nomination for the Senate seat currently occupied by Sen. Roland Burris.

I wonder what inspired Berkowitz to open his wallet for this guy. It seems to me most of his money – and certainly his big celebrity case prosecuting Jeff Skilling and Ken Lay – happened under a Republican administration.

October 26, 2009

Heads Up

Change is upon us.

I will be changing the title of this blog to “Cara Ellison On Enron.” This blog will only be about Enron. I’m going to remove all the non-Enron material.

I’ve created a new blog at ellisonblog.wordpress.com, which will be where I post political stuff, daily chitchat type of stuff, and book stuff.

I will still update this blog every day. It’s still active. It’s just become very popular and I feel like I need to separate out all the other stuff.

UPDATE

I’ve exported this blog to EllisonBlog. I’m removing all non-Enron posts from caraellison, but they can be found at Ellisonblog. Ellisonblog, however, will not have Enron updates after today. Cara Ellison as of right now is purely dedicated to Enron.

October 26, 2009

The Complete Humiliation of the Enron Task Force

Joe Weisenthal has written a great article,The Complete Humiliation of the Enron Task Force for Business Insider. It covers ten ginormous disasters for the ETF, including the Nigerian Barge trial, Arthur Andersen, and Enron Broadband Services.

It quotes a lot of Tom Kirkendall’s work on Enron, and is a succinct catalog of ETF blunders.

October 25, 2009

Today In Enron History

Today in 2001, everything was falling apart at Enron. Andy Fastow had been fired two days previous amid allegations of theft and fraud. Stock was diving; at the beginning of the week – October 19 – the stock price was $26.05. By October 26, the price had fallen 40%, to $15.40.

Dr. Lay was starting to get nervous. He called Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve, to keep him apprised of Enron’s diminishing condition, and to feel out the possibility of a bailout. After his conversation, he met with Dynegy chairman Charles Watson.

The end was near. You could feel it. A giant tectonic plate of the company was shifting, though, because the employees of Enron were optimistic Alpha types, they still believed they had a chance. They would continue to expend frenetic energy from this day to the collapse, fighting this huge invisible force that was dragging them down.

October 25, 2009

No, Really, McKinsey Is Evil

I had a funny email conversation with a friend who, like approximately 88% of the Enron staff, worked at McKinsey before Enron. I thought you’d find this amusing:

Cara:

After the Enron book, my next amazing trick will be….

MCKINSEY EXPOSED! Learn how this global consulting firm makes its billions of dollars. What was its relationship with Enron and Halliburton? Why do so many executives begin there? ARE THEY TRYING TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD? (Or is it just an accident???) Find out in Cara Ellison’s amazing bestseller revealing all the juicy secrets of MCKINSEY & CO!

Friend:

Maybe McKinsey is like the Illuminati or the Skull & Bones Club!

Cara:

I think it is! It’s craaaaaaaaaaaaaaazzzzzzzzzzzzy creepy! Like ENRON! Enron was really the Taliban and they were paying Dick Cheney. Hey, did you know that Ken Lay actually MET WITH THE PRESIDENT???????

Evil, I tells ya.

And I hear McKinsey only hires, like, smart people so it’s like this club of the wealthy smart elite and they’re trying to take over the world.

I shall expose them!

Incidentally, I am only half kidding about the McKinsey book. I think people think it’s a mysterious, nefarious organization (like Enron) but I could de-mystify it.

But maybe McKinsey likes its mystery?

Friend:

Actually, there is a spooky quality to McKinsey (or was when I was there).

Cara:

I’m a little disappointed that even a McKinsey employee thinks McKinsey is evil. Please tell me I’m right about Enron.

Friend:

Enron was practically Toys R Us compared to McKinsey.

October 21, 2009

Scott Yeager’s Victory Means More Than You Think

Scott Yeager, one of the finest human beings to ever walk the planet, was set free on October 20, 2009. The Fifth Circuit basically told the Government to go fuck themselves by clearing all the counts against Yeager. So basically after eight years, how many millions of dollars in lawyer fees, and the cost of passing up eight years of other business opportunities, the man can finally breathe.

It is interesting how the real milestones of life have a tendency to avoid the pomp and circumstance allotted to relatively unimportant things. Graduation from various generally indistinguishable steps of a fairly continuous educational process are celebrated with the fervor that only worthless things seem to provide, but the real changes sit in the corner, and are often only realized after the fact. I honestly believe that Yeager’s victory is one of those deeply profound events whose full impact may not be realized for years. His victory is not just about him – a fact evidenced by his victory at the Supreme Court, which law students will study and absorb and hopefully propagate as working attorneys, to preserve the sanctity of collateral estoppel. It’s not even about Enron. Yeager vs. USA is the turning point when businessmen finally stopped being victimized by the government. In the future, we will recognize Yeager as the first American businessman to successfully fight back against prosecutorial abuse that has become shamefully casual in this country.

It is my hope (and belief) that the Nigerian Barge case, and the Skilling case, will benefit, if only tangentially, from Yeager’s victory. The Nigerian Barge case, on the facts, actually has a lot in common with Skilling as they both involve “honest services”. But the larger implication is that in all three cases – Nigerian Barges, Skilling and Yeager – the government believed that because it was the government, it had the right to trample people, ruin people’s lives, bankrupt them, humiliate them, pressure them, and break them, in order to create a public perception that they were making progress.

And the public is not innocent in this. When Enron collapsed, the public was outraged. They wanted scalps, and did not care to hear any explanations, much less any defendant exert their innocence. The public wanted somebody – Daddy Government – to come in and spank the bad guys. Shame on the masses. Shame on them for making cretins like John Kroger and Andy Weismann necessary. Shame on them for being reactive instead of thoughtful.

The public, even now, wails with outrage (is it faux outrage? I honestly don’t know) when any white collar defendant is accused of a crime. The first cure for that outrage is simply examining the facts. Look at the record. Look at what Scott Yeager actually did, not what the government said he did. One example of this that amused me at the same time it infuriated me was a stupid little nothing event in which the government put on the stand some asshole to testify about Yeager’s calendar. Yeager did not know the guy, did not share his daily agenda with him, or anything like that. But this guy testified that Yeager had called for some meeting or something. When Yeager actually testified, he explained that the document in question, showing that he had “called the meeting” was written in his Lotus Notes calendar, and when you write in an event, the program automatically made you “Chair” of the event. Scott didn’t call the meeting. It’s a silly, stupid example, but the entire case was built on crap like this. Scott Yeager didn’t fucking call the meeting! The record shows that. And the record also shows he didn’t trade on inside information. It shows that Joe Hirko (bless him) was acting ethically when he signed off on that Warpspeed press release. It shows that Rex Shelby was correct when he said that the BOS was working – but that no software is complete “until it’s obsolete.”

The men were telling the truth. The record proves it.

Jeff Skilling was telling the truth, too. You know, there’s a weird little theory the government had that Scott Yeager was actually the puppetmaster, controlling Jeff Skilling. It’s preposterous, but I swear, that’s the government theory. Well, it’s sort of ironic that Yeager the “puppetmaster” has cleared the way at the Supreme Court for Jeff Skilling. There’s a certain poetry in that.

Scott Yeager is not an ordinary man. He would probably say he is, but he’s not. He’s an extraordinary individual, a man of such strength that we should all try to be more like him.

I’m so happy that he’s free now. It is good for him, good for the other Enron cases, and it is good for America.

October 20, 2009

Chron Finally Mentions Yeager Decision

Mary Flood at the Chronhas finally gotten around to writing a few words about Scott Yeager’s victory. Some good quotes by Canales.

We here at Cara Ellison Corp. still heart Canales.
We never stopped hearting Yeager or Shelby.

Great, great day for victory!

October 20, 2009

The Yeager Silence

The news of Scott Yeager’s freedom has apparently not yet hit the news. I’ve googled “Scott Yeager” and “Scott Yeager Enron” this morning but the only thing to come up is the news of Jeff Skilling’s Supreme Court win.

I wonder why this is. What possible reason could the media, particularly the Chron, have for keeping quiet about this?